Monday, January 9, 2012

Dumb ABC Debate Questions and Good Answers

You have seen sound bites of the Debates on television and depending on the network there is usually a liberal spin added in the commentary.

The Network commentators are fine, good people, generally with a very Liberal outlook. They honestly believe what they say and the leaning they present. However, most live in a shell next to each other and do not know what is going on in the rest of the country [clueless].

Here is an example of 15 minutes of uncut Questioning [?]. You be the judge after seeing the complete segment, uncut, untouched.  This is limited to a maximum of 15 minutes.




Dumb ABC Debate Questions
and Good Answers by the candidates.

ABC's George Steponopolis and Diane Sawyer show their prowess and persistence in what appears to be a rehearsed or orchestrated attempt to embarrass the candidate(s).
These are Candidates for President of The United States.

Steponopolis's unending question continues for 5 + minutes and is interwoven for almost 15 minutes as the original question gets expanded.

Diane Sawyer's approach to asking a question is like asking a kindergartner - slow deliberate statements interwoven into a question asked of a child. Get Real!

The Candidates for President come up with Good Answers. But the questioners [?] forget this is a Presidential Debate not some question / skits that could show up in "Saturday Night Live." [Or another comedy stage - hear audience responce]

These were the worst of the worst commentators [Moderators?] so far by the Liberal Networks. ABC failed their responsibility of a Fair and Balanced presentation.

Where was the relevance to persistent nonsensical questioning. There are topic of higher National importance to discuss.

You be the Judge!

.

0 comments: